Search for: "Blurred Entertainment, Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am by Ben
Leo Feist, Inc. 234 F. 105 (S.D.N.Y. 1916) where Judge Learned Hand had to compare two works to determine if there had been copying. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 8:06 am by Keith Lee
Entertainment is now a multi-faceted, multi-media onslaught of digital interactivity in which the the line between consumer and producer has become blurred. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
Mattel, Inc., 100 USPQ2d 1868 (TTAB 2011) [precedential].The Board sustained UMG's opposition to the mark MOTOWN METAL for toy vehicles and accessories, finding it likely to cause confusion with, and likely to dilute by blurring, the famous mark MOTOWN for musical entertainment and musical recordings. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:05 am
On the dilution front, the Board made it clear that the defense of parody is unavailable in the dilution-by-blurring context. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 7:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc., 11 Civ. 9436 (ALC) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
6 May 2021, 3:43 am
Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd. and NBA Properties, Inc., Opposition Nos. 91222422 (Parent), 91222445, 91226092 and 91228458 (May 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis).Monster Energy's Section 2(d) Claims: The Board found Monster's M-Claw mark to be inherently strong. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 3:20 am by John L. Welch
Fantasies, Inc., Opposition No. 91170977 [Opposition to registration of BARBIE GRIFFIN for adult entertainment services, on the ground of likelihood of confusion and likelihood of dilution (both blurring and tarnishment) of the allegedly famous mark BARBIE for dolls and other goods].Text Copyright John L. [read post]